Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Chinese Pediatric Emergency Medicine ; (12): 1071-1076, 2021.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-930786

ABSTRACT

Objective:To investigate the effects of critical care chest ultrasonic examination(CCUE)on different fluid management phases among septic shock infants in pediatric intensive care unit(PICU).Methods:Twenty-two infants who were hospitalized in PICU during January 2017 to December 2018 and diagnosed as septic shock were included in this study.These infants received shock and infection management as well as mechanical ventilation according to the septic shock management guidelines.CCUE was applied as needed to monitor the hemodynamic status for titrated adjustment in fluid and vasoactive drug management and its impacts were evaluated.Results:The change frequencies of treatment regimen according to CCUE evaluation were different among different phases( P<0.001). Compared with the other 3 phases, the number of adjustment made to fluid management scheme caused by CCUE during the first phase was the largest(75.0%, P<0.001), and that during the fourth phase was the smallest(2.3%, P<0.01). The frequency of change during the second phase(30.5%) and the third phase(23.5%) showed no difference( P=0.210). During the first phase, compared with the group with intravenous infusion speed<10 mL/(kg·h), the group with faster intravenous infusion speed had lower LUS score and more proportion of LVEF and RVEF above 50%( P<0.05). During the second phase and the third phase, compared with group receiving slower intravenous infusion, group with faster intravenous infusion had more LVEF>50%( P<0.05). Conclusion:Application of CCUE to monitor dynamic hemodynamic of infants with septic shock in PICU has different effects on fluid management scheme adjustment at different phase.CCUE evaluation during the early 3 phases, especially during the first phase has greater influence on fluid management strategy.Rapid infusion under CCUE monitoring is often limited by cardiac ejection fraction, LUS, and mainly LVEF, especially during the first phase.Multiple ultrasonic indicators should be combined with clinical data for full evaluation.

2.
Chinese Pediatric Emergency Medicine ; (12): 40-44, 2020.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-799209

ABSTRACT

Objective@#To investigate the effects of critical care chest ultrasonic examination (CCUE) by intensive care physician on fluid management among septic shock patients in pediatric intensive care unit (PICU).@*Methods@#Forty children from PICU who were diagnosed as septic shock in Shenzhen Bao′an Maternal and Child Health Hospital were included in this study.Twenty-two of them who were hospitalized in PICU during January 2017 to December 2018, under the care of 4 PICU physicians who had certificates of the Chinese Critical Ultrasound Study Group(CCUSG) were defined as CCUE group.Eighteen PICU patients from January 2014 to December 2015 having no access to CCUE were recruited as control group.Both groups were treated according to the septic shock management guidelines with routine anti-shock and anti-infection therapy, as well as mechanical ventilation.Fluid management following conventional protocol was performed in the control group.While in the CCUE group, CCUE was applied to monitor the hemodynamic status for adjustment in fluid management.@*Results@#Compared with the control group, the CCUE group had shorter mechanical ventilation time as well as less fluid intake and output within 48 hours after admission[(4.68±2.06)d vs.(7.33±0.49)d, (6.34±1.85)ml/(kg·h) vs.(8.55±0.39) ml/(kg·h), (2.47±1.22)ml/(kg·h) vs.(6.18±1.72)ml/(kg·h)] (P<0.05). The CCUE group also had a more positive fluid balance and larger dosage of midazolam and fentanyl administration[(3.87±2.33)ml/(kg·h) vs.(2.37±2.10)ml/(kg·h), (5.62±2.39)μg/(kg·min) vs.(1.68±0.82)μg/(kg·min), (1.41±0.39)μg/(kg·h) vs.(0.95±0.56)μg/(kg·h)] (P<0.05). The two groups showed no differences in vasoactive-inotropic score within 48 h(11.11±6.08 vs.9.90±4.12), dosage of furosemide[(1.07±0.52)mg/(kg.d) vs.(0.94±0.15)mg/(kg·d)], length of PICU stay[(10.73±7.48)d vs.(10.00±2.91)d], intubation rate after 1 hour of volume resuscitation[54.5%(12/22)vs.33.33%(6/18)] or mortality[8.3%(2/24)vs.5.3%(1/19)] (P>0.05).@*Conclusion@#Application of CCUE helps to optimize fluid management and shorten the ventilation time among children with septic shock in PICU.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL